Note, if you’re looking at a Wayfarer style like the Ray-Ban Wayfarer Blaze 4440N, you won’t have a lens size as they come in one standard size. Therefore, the lens size won’t be printed on the inside of the arm. Ray-Ban Wayfarer Sizes A New Wayfarer comes in three sizes. 52mm, 55mm, 58mm. 52mm is the smallest and the lens “tilts” the most. 55mm is the standard fit and will fit most adults just fine. Finally the 58mm lens is the largest size that you can buy. The New Wayfarer is, as the name suggests, the newer, younger brother of the Wayfarer. It looks similar but has a more modern feel and approach. Mainly, the traditional tilt is less. It also boasts more sizes than its older brother.

The Original Wayfarer has 2 sizes. 50 and 54. This is 50mm width and a 54mm lens width. As a general rule of thumb, the 50 is a standard fit, and will fit most faces. The 54mm is a large fit and caters for those with a larger face. Passariello, Christina. "Return of the Wayfarers: Luxottica revamps once-cool Ray-Bans with an eye to women." The Wall Street Journal Europe (October 27, 2006). a b c d e Bayley, Stephen. "Notes & Theories: Through a Pair of Glasses Darkly." The Independent on Sunday (June 18, 2006). The Ray-Ban brand was sold to Italian Luxottica Group in 1999, [1], who created a second revival in the mid 2000s. [2] [3] Design and early popularity [ edit ] Figure 1, US design patent #169,995 Musician Roy Orbison in his trademark Wayfarers In summary, an Original Wayfarer comes in sizes 47mm, 50mm and 54mm. 47 being the smallest, and rarest to find. 50mm is the standard fit and will fit most adults perfectly. 54mm is the largest size available.Ellis, Bret Easton. American Psycho. Vintage (1991): p70, 71, 81, 224, 242, 257, 394. ISBN 0-679-73577-1. a b Bland, Simon (3 August 2020). "Dan Aykroyd and John Landis: how we made The Blues Brothers". The Guardian . Retrieved 20 September 2023. COMPANY NEWS; BAUSCH & LOMB SELLING SUNGLASS BUSINESS TO LUXOTTICA". The New York Times. April 29, 1999 . Retrieved 2014-10-27.

Ray-Ban Wayfarer sunglasses and eyeglasses have been manufactured by Ray-Ban since 1952. Made popular in the 1950s and 1960s by music and film icons such as Buddy Holly, Roy Orbison and James Dean, Wayfarers almost became discontinued in the 1970s, before a major resurgence was created in the 1980s through massive product placements. Next, you will get a bunch of numbers and possibly letters. This may be 601/71. This is the colour of the frame and lens.The biggest thing to note when buying a different size in a New Wayfarer is the design change over the sizes. What we mean by that is, the bigger the size, the less tilt in the lens. So, from the smallest size 52 (52mm width lens) you get a shorter lens. One more reminiscent of the Original 2140. But more importantly, you get more of a tilt too. Google patent search for Raymond Stegeman. 70 of 72 patents issued to Stegeman were assigned to Bausch and Lomb.

Wayfarers were designed in 1952 by American optical designer Raymond Stegeman, [4] [5] [6] who worked for Bausch & Lomb, Ray-Ban's parent company at that time. [7] The design was inspired by, "a mid-century classic to rival Eames chairs and Cadillac tail fins." [5] According to design critic Stephen Bayley, the "distinctive trapezoidal frame spoke a non-verbal language that hinted at unstable dangerousness, but one nicely tempered by the sturdy arms which, according to the advertising, gave the frames a 'masculine look'." [5] The sunglasses also featured a new plastic molding technology. [2] [5] 1970s and 1980s [ edit ] Classic 1980s Ray-Ban Wayfarer sunglasses (picture shows model B&L5022, another one named B&L5024 is also available, which is 2 mm wider at the nose bridge but identical otherwise) There is a 47 size for the Wayfarer. This is very rare to find and is usually sold by special request. As you can probably guess already, this is a small size and fits the smallest of adult faces. If you’re unsure on your size, we would say go with the 50 and see how that fits first. If you’re used to just being able to pop any pair of Ray-Ban sunglasses on your face, then the 50 will fit 9 times out of 10. Ray-Ban New Wayfarer Sizes

SHOP

Well, as you’re well aware, Ray-Ban Wayfarer sizes are a thing. And, as much as we’d love to say that it doesn’t make that much of a difference, it really does. Especially on the New Wayfarer where the size changes the whole look of the sunglasses. The Three Ray-Ban Wayfarer sizes are 52, 55 and 58. 55 is a standard fit and will fit most faces. 58 is much larger. Finally, the size 52 is the smallest size available. This is for those smaller faces. a b c d e f Rushton, Susie. "Ray Ban Wayfarer spec-tacular revival" The New Zealand Herald. (May 06, 2007.)

a b Brown, Rachel. "A Blast from the Past at Vision Expo West" Women's Wear Daily (October 8, 2007). Ray-Ban's Folding Wayfarer Classic RB4105 is a pair of timelessly styled sunglasses with a cutting-edge folding feature. Aimed at those who need the ultimate in portability, these sunglasses are priced the same as standard Wayfarer Classics.In September 2021, Ray-Ban and Facebook Reality Labs announced a collaboration for smart glasses including Wayfarers with built in cameras called Ray-Ban Stories. [26] Similar designs and mistaken identity [ edit ] The sunglasses worn by Audrey Hepburn in Breakfast at Tiffany's, although often identified as Wayfarers, are actually "Manhattan" by Oliver Goldsmith. [27] Oppenheimer, Jerry. Front Row: Anna Wintour, the Cool Life and Hot Times of Vogue's Editor-in-Chief. St. Martin's Press (2005): p215. ISBN 0-312-32310-7. Campbell, Craig (5 May 2017). "80 years of Ray-Bans: Shades don't come much cooler than these! - Sunday Post". Sunday Post . Retrieved 12 July 2017. If you’re looking at a pair in person, say in a shop, you can see the size by looking at the code on the inside left arm (temple). This is split up in different sections. For a Ray-Ban Wayfarer, you’ll see 2140 as the first 4 numbers, the New Wayfarer will be 2132. This is the model code. Norris, Scott. "Boosting the Hottest Shades Under the Sun." Rochester Business Journal (Oct. 9, 1989), section 1, p10.