I actually view this as a positive attribute as it forces proper use of hood (I see hoods used in reverse position FAR too often). Matthew Richards is a photographer and journalist who has spent years using and reviewing all manner of photo gear. He is Digital Camera World's principal lens reviewer – and has tested more primes and zooms than most people have had hot dinners! One of Nikon's better lenses, the Nikon offers superior sharpness, but poorer CA performance, when compared to the Tamron. We haven't had an opportunity yet to test this lens on a full-frame body. Otherwise, both lenses feature USM style focusing and image stabilization. While Tamron has manufactured many popular telephoto zoom lenses that extend to 300mm for DSLR cameras, the newly released 70-300mm F/4.5-6.3 Di III RXD is the first model designed for full-frame mirrorless cameras. Developed with the concept of bringing the joy of easy telephoto shooting to photographers everywhere, it’s the world’s smallest and lightest 70-300mm zoom lens at 148mm and 545g and delivers exceptional image quality. At 70mm f/4.5, the pair nets very good resolution in the middle third of the frame (4,200 lines), but softens considerably when you look anywhere toward the periphery; the off-center average is just 1,400 lines, resulting in blurred details on the a7R IV.

Tamron 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di LD Macro 1:2 AF Review

Spend a little more and get something better. Even if the alternative doesn't go all the way to 300mm. Chromatic aberration is noticeable at the longer focal lengths and in the corners, but is no issue at shorter focal lengths and in the center. The big problem of my copy is strong purple fringing at high contrast edges. Just one other reviewer noted this in this forum, so I assume that this could be a specific problem of my copy. I did not notice any distortion, vignetting or flare that is worth mentioning. Build-quality is acceptable for amateur-use. Focusing is slow at times but always accurate and I noticed occasional hunting at low-light. Transcontinenta UK Ltd., the distributor for Tamron UK and Ireland, introduces a new telephoto zoom lens for Sony E-mount full-frame mirrorless cameras: The Nikon 70 - 300 VR lense I bought subsequently does a better job of photographing birds (at a much higher cost). I also bought a Nikon 105 VR Micro lense which, while excellent, does not provide the same working distance as the Tamron lense.

The optical formula is comprised of 15 elements in 10 groups, including one low dispersion front element, and it has an iris diaphragm with seven rounded aperture blades. As usual, a low percentage of sharp images can be captured at even longer exposure durations - as low as 1/10 at 300mm. things i hate about it are for one the rather stiff zoom ring and when it is at 300mm and MFD of 0.95m

Tamron 70-300mm F4.5-6.3 Di III RXD Review | Photography Blog Tamron 70-300mm F4.5-6.3 Di III RXD Review | Photography Blog

There's some distortion present in images shot with the Tamron 70-300mm ƒ/4-5.6, but no more than other lenses in this category. At 70mm, the distortion is almost negligible - just a slight amount of barrel in the corners. From 135mm and on, there's significant pincushion distortion in the corners. As usual, this distortion is much more significant when the lens is used on full-frame cameras such as the 1Ds Mark III. This is a great lens for the Sony system. The running joke about the Sony lens among Canikon users was its half as good at twice the price. A good number of people chose to adapt a Canon and save a few hundred. His expertise with equipment doesn’t end there, though. He is also an encyclopedia when it comes to all manner of cameras, camera holsters and bags, flashguns, tripods and heads, printers, papers and inks, and just about anything imaging-related. This will be noticeable in certain shots - such as when an evenly-blue sky is in the corner of a frame.At 70mm, f/4 is available, but at 300mm, f/5.6 is the widest aperture available - a 1 stop difference - allowing 1/2 as much light to reach the sensor. Build quality is fine, but not quite as good as past Tamron "SP" branded lenses that we've reviewed. The Tamron 70-300mm F4.5-6.3 Di III RXD feels solid enough in your hand, despite its aluminum-magnesium alloy construction. What makes it strange is that this only happens with this lens, and only close or at the 300mm end of the focal length, anything between 200-300 is likely to cause the error. another big downside of the lens it has massive color fringing in harsh contrast situations especially

Tamron A17NII AF 70-300mm F/4-5.6 Di LD Macro 1:2 Nikon+Motor Tamron A17NII AF 70-300mm F/4-5.6 Di LD Macro 1:2 Nikon+Motor

Autofocus: All lenses in this comparison offer autofocus with built-in focus drive. Manual-focus override is by simply turning the dedicated focus ring. On the Tamron 70-300 the focus ring turns the way Nikon users are used to and it has the non-linear gearing which most lenses for mirrorless cameras offer. But although the lens has a USB-C port to connect via computer to Tamron’s lens Utility (TLU) you cannot switch between variable or linear gearing nor can the direction of the ring be reversed – as you can do with the Z-Nikkor 100-400. Focus on the F-Nikkor 70-300 works differently as it has a direct linear mechanical coupling between the focus ring and the focus action. [+] One of the biggest selling points of the Tamron 70-300mm f/4.5-6.3 Di III RXD is the lens’s small size and weight. Critically, at 545 grams / 1.2 pounds, this Tamron lens is a good bit lighterthan Nikon’s closest alternative – the AF-P 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6E combined with the FTZ II adapter (which is 805 grams, or 1.8 pounds, for the combo). It’s among the lightest full-frame telephoto zooms available today! The Tamron 70-300mm f/4.5-6.3 is a pretty small and lightweight lens Use with teleconverters: No, neither the Tamron nor the F-Nikkor can be used with Nikon teleconverters. Only the Z-Nikkor 100-400 can use Nikon’s Z TC-1.4x and Z TC-2.0x. [0] Here is a comparison of the aperture step down between the Tamron and some Canon telephoto lens models. The Canon lens most comparable to the Tamron 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di VC USD Lens is the Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM Lens.

As with most telephoto zoom lenses, the resolution drops as you zoom in, but this budget lens still holds its own well, producing good to very good resolution at all apertures until diffraction robs the lens of contrast and sharpness below f/22. Shooting at these apertures would be a creative decision though. I've also sometimes noticed that the issue shows up purely by focusing on something in the distance, before I even take the shot.

Tamron AF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di LD Macro Interchangeable Lens Tamron AF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di LD Macro Interchangeable Lens

Like most consumer telephoto lenses, the Tamron 70-300mm f/4.5-6.3 extends when zoomed, as you can see below. It’s a single-barrel telescoping design, and the length of the lens increases by about 40% as you zoom from 70mm to 300mm. I’m not a fan of telescoping lens barrels, but it’s hard to avoid in lenses like this. 70mm compared to 300mm It should be noted that our test sample of the Canon 70-300mm ƒ/4-5.6L is actually on par with the Tamron in terms of performance.) For the price I honestly think you can do no better. useful focal range, 6-year warranty, sharp, comes with petal shaped hood.For one 1/3 the price of the Canon 70-200 IS (L) the Tamron is surely a great buy and very highly recommended. I bought this lens about 18 months ago for use on my Nikon D80. Mine is the built in motor version, which focusses a bit slowly, but accurately. Focus breathing (image changes size when focusing) is noticeable at the wide end, but far less apparent to me at 300mm.